|
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS OF BARRIERS ON RIVERS
ENTERING THE BAY OF FUNDY:
Report of an ad-hoc Environment Canada Working Group
Peter G. Wells
Environmental Conservation Branch
Environment Canada, 45 Alderney Drive,
Dartmouth, N.S. B2Y 2N6.
April 1999
Canadian Wildlife Service Technical Report
Series No. 334
|
[Note: only the abstract, resumé, table of
contents, summary
and conclusions, and recommendations are included below.]
Paper copies may be obtained from: |
Canadian Wildlife Service, Atlantic Region,
P.O. Box 1590,
Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada E0A 3C0 |
Dr. P.G.Wells
Environment Canada,
45 Alderney Drive,
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada B2Y 2N6 |
ABSTRACT
A wide range and number of barriers exist on
rivers that drain into the Bay of Fundy, both upstream and on their estuaries. Barriers
can be defined as any structure built into, through or over a waterway (stream, creek,
river, estuary) that changes, possibly irreversibly, the physical (e.g. sedimentation,
water circulation), chemical (e.g. salinity, oxygen, trace elements), biological (e.g.
fish behavior) or ecological (e.g. production) characteristics of that waterway. Tidal
barriers are obstructions constructed in or across a tidal water body that changes the
tidal fluctuation in all or part of the water body above the obstruction. Barriers on Bay
of Fundy rivers and their estuaries include dykes, aboiteau, causeways (with bridges,
culverts and dams), dams and wharves. An ad-hoc Environment Canada working group was
established in 1997; it convened to summarize what was known about the location, number,
type, impacts and remediation potential associated with Fundy
barriers. This report presents the working groups findings. Barriers
exist on at least 25 of 44 major rivers around the Bay of Fundy. They have caused or are
thought to have caused a wide range of ecological effects on the rivers themselves and
their estuaries around the bay. These include: reduced lengths of tidal rivers, changed
freshwater discharges, reduced movement of saltwater upstream, changed hydrodynamics,
sedimentation (often severe), reduced open salt marsh, reduced nutrient transfer to the
Bay, and interference with the movement of fish and invertebrates. However, the full scope
of environmental impacts is not well understood at the present time; except for a few
rivers and their estuaries, our data are largely anecdotal. It is recommended that federal
agencies, provincial departments and other groups and interested parties consider
strengthening the data and information base on barriers, update river flow information,
model changes and cumulative effects, and determine the effects of rehabilitation or
remediation efforts on selected river barriers. |
RÉSUMÉ
Les rivières qui se jettent dans la baie de Fundy comportent un
grand nombre dobstacles divers, tant dans leurs cours supérieurs que dans leurs
estuaires. Par obstacle, on entend ici toute structure aménagée au sein, en travers ou
au-dessus dun cours deau (fleuve, rivière, ruisseau ou estuaire) qui modifie,
parfois irréversiblement, les caractéristiques physique (p. ex. sédimentation et
circulation de leau), chimiques (p. ex. salinité, oxygène, éléments traces),
biologiques (p. ex. comportement du poisson) ou écologiques (p. ex. production) du cours
deau. Les obstacles à la marée qui modifient le flux de marée dans la totalité
ou une partie des eaux en question, en amont de ces obstacles. Dans les rivières de la
baie de Fundy et leurs estuaires, ces obstacles comprennent les digues, les aboiteaux, les
chaussées (dotés de ponts, de buses et de barrages), les barrages et les quais. Un
groupe de travail spécial a été mis sur pied par Environnement Canada en 1997; il a
dressé un inventaire des données connues sur lemplacement, le nombre et le type de
ces obstacles, ainsi que sur leurs incidences et sur les mesures correctives possibles. Le
présent rapport expose ses constations. Sur 44 grandes rivières de la baie de Fundy, au
moins 25 comportent des obstacles. On sait ou on pense que ceux-ci ont eu des incidences
biologiques nombreuses et variées sur les rivières elles-mêmes et sur leurs estuaires.
Ils ont, notamment, diminué la longueur des rivières, modifié lécoulement
deau douce, réduit lapport deau salée en amont, modifié
lhydrodynamique et la sédimentation (souvent gravement), rétréci les marais
littoraux, réduit le transfert de matières nutritives vers la baie et gêné la
migration des poissons et des invertébrés. Toutefois, on ne saisit pas très bien
actuellement toute la portée des incidences environnementales; exception faite de
quelques rivières et de leurs estuaires, nos renseignements; exception faite de quelques
rivières et de leurs estuaires, nos renseignements sont très anecdotiques. On recommande
que les organismes fédéraux, les ministères provinciaux, dautres groupes et les
parties intéressées envisagent daccroître la base de données et de
renseignements sur les obstacles, mettent à jour les données sur le débit des cours
deau, modélisent les changements survenus et leur effets cumulés, et déterminent
les effets des mesures ou de réparation dans certaines rivières obstruées. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
............................................................................................................................i
RÉSUMÉ................................................................................................................................
ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.........................................................................................................
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
.........................................................................................................
iv
LIST OF TABLES AND LIST OF APPENDICES
.................................................................... v
SOME THOUGHTS
...............................................................................................................
vi
1. INTRODUCTION
...........................................................................................................
1
2. BACKGROUND TO THE WORKING GROUPS REVIEW OF THE ISSUE ................. 2
2.1
Overview...............................................................................................................
2
2.2 Literature Summary
..................................................................................... 3
3. EARLY CHANGES TO RIVERS AND LAND AROUND THE BAY OF FUNDY ............. 6
3.1 Dykes and Dykelands
.................................................................................. 6
3.2 Log Dams and Power Dams
........................................................................ 6
3.3 Land Use in the Watersheds of
Fundy Rivers ............................................. 7
4. IMPACTS OF BARRIERS ON RIVERS ENTERING THE BAY OF FUNDY
(1950s to late
1990s).....................................................................................................
7
5. BAY OF FUNDY CASE STUDIES AND OTHER COASTAL EXAMPLES ..................... 20
5.1 Bay of Fundy
...............................................................................................
20
5.2 Other Atlantic Coastal
Locations ................................................................. 20
5.3 Other Watersheds and Coasts
.................................................................... 21
6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
................................................................................ 22
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
.................................................................................................
22
BIBLIOGRAPHY
....................................................................................................................23
APPENDICES
.....................................................................................................................
28
Appendix 1 Members of Working Group
....................................................................... 28
Appendix 2 Additional Information
on Impacts of Barriers............................................. 29
Appendix 3 Notes and additions from
the 1997 Workshop ........................................... 33
LIST OF TABLES
1. Summary of status of barriers on New Brunswick
rivers that flow into the Bay of Fundy
2. Summary of status of barriers on Nova Scotia rivers that flow into the Bay of Fundy
3. Man-made barriers on medium and large rivers flowing into the Bay of Fundy
4. Functions of barriers and presence of fishways on rivers flowing into the Bay of Fundy
LIST OF APPENDICES
1. Members of Working Group
2. Additional Information on Impacts of Barriers
3. Notes and additions from the 1997 Workshop |
6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Given the importance and many values of the living resources and
ecology of the rivers and estuaries of the Bay of Fundy, there is a clear need to consider
the barriers issue in depth. Barriers, especially dams, causeways and dykes, exist on at
least 25 of 44 major Bay of Fundy rivers. They have caused or are thought to have caused a
wide range of ecological effects on the rivers themselves and their estuaries around the
bay. These include: reduced lengths of tidal rivers, changed freshwater discharges,
reduced movement of saltwater upstream, changed hydrodynamics, sedimentation (often
severe), reduced open salt marsh, reduced nutrient transfer to the Bay, and interference
with the movement of fish and invertebrates. Effects on some systems are becoming
understood with time and effort e.g. the Petitcodiac, Avon and Annapolis Rivers and their
estuaries. However, the full scope of environmental impacts of most of the barriers, alone
and together, and the potential benefits of remediation efforts, are not well understood
at the present time. This is due in part to the complexity and inter-disciplinary nature
of the problem(s), the low profile of the issue generally (the Petitcodiac and Annapolis
Rivers being obvious exceptions), and the shortage of resources to study the problem in an
integrated manner in the depth that it deserves. At the very least, we should re-examine
and strengthen the information on the condition of individual rivers and the Bay of Fundy
as a whole, and consider the options for action. |
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
Several actions should be considered by the
appropriate federal and provincial natural resource, transportation/highway and energy
agencies, and all interested parties and stakeholders, at their earliest convenience:
1) Data and Information Base: to strengthen the
data and information base on changes in rivers related to barriers, especially by
"ground-truthing" the presence and extent of barriers on all Fundy rivers and
streams (major and minor) and their estuaries, and by measuring features such as the area
and condition of remaining open salt marshes. This might be accomplished through one or
more jointly funded, coordinated research projects, followed by a Workshop with research
papers and reviews.
2) River Flow Characteristics: to determine total
annual flows into the Bay of Fundy from the rivers and the level of change in volumes or
changes in other flow characteristics, due to barriers, and the influence this might have
or have had on estuaries and the broader Bay of Fundy. This would follow from Gregory et
al. (1993).
3) Modeling Changes and Cumulative Effects:
following from Points 1) and 2), to build a simulation model of the changes (Section 4) to
test the hypothesis of gradual cumulative effects (positive or negative) on biological and
ecological processes in important geographic parts of the Bay of Fundy or the greater Gulf
of Maine.
4) Determining Effects of Rehabilitation and Remediation: following
from Point 3), to run the model as a way of testing effects of local and area-wide
rehabilitation efforts, and as a way of setting priorities for remediation initiatives.
5) Conducting a Pilot Project on Selected Rivers and
Species: given the number of habitats and species across all rivers and estuaries
in the Bay of Fundy, and the need to simplify an approach to quantifying impacts and
effects of remediation, one project could be "to explore the usefulness of an index
river/species approach to identifying the impacts of barriers on the living resources of
the Bay of Fundy and the means of mitigation" (R. Bradford, pers. comm., 3/99). |
|